Eh, just remember the Judaic order of things. If I quote a fallible leader, and you quote a fallible leader, we\'ve got ourselves a debate. However, if I quote the Torah, and you counter it with a fallible, though inspired leader, chances are I won\'t look QUITE as deeply for an explanation. When in doubt, I\'ll go with the Torah. But Messiah is Torah-made-flesh, so the Gospels and Peter would carry about the same weight, with me. Oh, and Revelations is prophecy, and so I consider comparable to the other prophetic books from the OT. Hebrews, I believe, would rightly also be called historical, and not directly dictated by G-d, but still belongs in the Bible for the context it provides.