Find one. It must contain only one presuposition: The things around us actually exist. Or, if you can do it without that presuposition, even better. Get to it!

First of all dante, your proof is already been proven ridiculously fake. You cannot believe in the Bible and God simultaneously and be a Christian... It states in the Bible that God created the world - obviously. Us, Christians, believe in it because we have FAITH in God and KNOW that it is True. In reference to your "scientific" response, evolution is more of a peer pressure - like Global Warming. It is "necessary" to believe in the scientific community. A ridiculous assumption simply because the scientists do not have what they consider "facts." Later in Darwin's theory, was the statement he made about how he thought he was unable to even prove himself correct since the matter of the subject was too complex. I would suggest STRONGLY to see the documentary that is coming out next Friday I believe on the proof against Darwinism. A recent debate between the teacher in Farris Bueler's Day Off (Can't remember his name) and Stephen Hawking was a result of the following (approximately): Teacher: Would you possibly believe that it may be possible that God could exist? ... Teacher: Maybe 1%? Hawking: Sure, maybe 1%. Teacher: Ok, if 1%, then how about possibly 5%? Hawking: Sure, maybe 5%. Teacher: Ok, if there is a 5% chance then possibly there is a 51%chance? Hawking: No, not a 51% chance? Teacher: Then maybe a 49% chance? Hawking: Sure, maybe a 49% chance. An obvious sign that scientists truly do not have a definite answer on what they "know" is right.

[b]WIll_00 wrote:[/b] [quote]First of all dante, your proof is already been proven ridiculously fake. You cannot believe in the Bible and God simultaneously and be a Christian... It states in the Bible that God created the world - obviously. Us, Christians, believe in it because we have FAITH in God and KNOW that it is True. In reference to your "scientific" response, evolution is more of a peer pressure - like Global Warming. It is "necessary" to believe in the scientific community. A ridiculous assumption simply because the scientists do not have what they consider "facts." Later in Darwin's theory, was the statement he made about how he thought he was unable to even prove himself correct since the matter of the subject was too complex. I would suggest STRONGLY to see the documentary that is coming out next Friday I believe on the proof against Darwinism. A recent debate between the teacher in Farris Bueler's Day Off (Can't remember his name) and Stephen Hawking was a result of the following (approximately): Teacher: Would you possibly believe that it may be possible that God could exist? ... Teacher: Maybe 1%? Hawking: Sure, maybe 1%. Teacher: Ok, if 1%, then how about possibly 5%? Hawking: Sure, maybe 5%. Teacher: Ok, if there is a 5% chance then possibly there is a 51%chance? Hawking: No, not a 51% chance? Teacher: Then maybe a 49% chance? Hawking: Sure, maybe a 49% chance. An obvious sign that scientists truly do not have a definite answer on what they "know" is right.[/quote] This is not a disscussion of science! Science is only reasonable possibility formed by perception and opinion.

[quote] This is not a disscussion of science! Science is only reasonable possibility formed by perception and opinion.[/quote] How can one proove that in "fact" this is not Science? Is not Science nearly all topics allowed to dwell upon one with "definitive proof."